I’m new to AI-driven content. I keep hearing how AI platforms effortlessly create written reports and articles, computer code, music, visual art and more. As a writer, this comes as a bit of shock to me. I’ve always thought my career was fairly safe from cost-savings strategies, like outsourcing writing to India or Poland or the Philippines, where English is often a second language. But the onset of AI-powered tasking is suddenly the talk of the town.
On Nov. 30, 2022, ChatGPT was released to very little fanfare. Today, it is a hot topic in the media and politics, the subject of hand wringing among any number of sectors fearing inaccurate, harmful, or otherwise unethical results. At the G-7 Summit May 21-23, global leaders paid special attention to AI, committing to work with technology leaders to ensure safe and trustworthy AI, and in June, prompted by public ChatGPT concerns, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called for the U.S. to regulate AI. On July 13, the Federal Trade Commission announced its investigation of the headline-grabbing technology.
ChatGPT seems to have captured public attention by its timing and its features. It promises to automate much of the work many of us procrastinate doing, from writing reports and documents to conducting research. It has made us pause and question what the future of work, school, even our personal lives will be if we are relying on AI to do it.
At dinner this weekend, a friend extolled the benefits of AI and how he asked ChatGPT to write a set of emails that he could send in a drip campaign to promote his business. He was astonished when it returned the emails with the right tone, the right information, and the right sequencing that he was looking for — all in a matter of seconds.
Curious, I thought, “maybe this ChatGPT thingy could help me write a blog post.” Of course, it would have to retain my signature wit, charm and searing insights. No small task for a soulless machine that collects data and spits out a totally emotionless product for free.
So I asked it to write a blog post examining the investigation of cocaine found in the White House. Here’s what it gave me in about 30 seconds:
Title: Uncovering the Truth: Examining the Investigation of Cocaine Found in the White House
Introduction: In a shocking turn of events, the recent discovery of cocaine within the confines of the White House has sent ripples through the nation. As the investigation unfolds, it becomes crucial to examine the circumstances surrounding this incident and shed light on the steps being taken to uncover the truth. This blog post aims to delve into the ongoing investigation, highlighting its significance, potential challenges, and the implications it holds for the reputation of the White House and the wider implications for national security.
- The Gravity of the Situation: The presence of illegal substances within the White House is an unprecedented breach of security. It raises concerns about the vulnerability of one of the most heavily guarded places in the country. The investigation should leave no stone unturned in order to determine how such a breach occurred and identify the individuals responsible. This is not just about illicit drugs; it is about the integrity and sanctity of an institution that holds immense symbolic value.
- Transparency and Impartiality: To maintain public trust, the investigation must be conducted with utmost transparency and impartiality. It is imperative that all involved parties, whether they are White House staff, visitors, or other individuals, are subjected to a fair and comprehensive examination. Any perception of bias or cover-up would further erode public confidence in the investigation’s findings and undermine the credibility of the White House as an institution.
- The Challenge of Internal Investigations: Investigating illegal activities within the White House poses unique challenges. The very nature of the environment necessitates thorough scrutiny of the staff and individuals who have access to the premises. Balancing the need for confidentiality and preserving national security with the imperative of accountability is a delicate task. This investigation should strive to strike the right balance and ensure that no one is above the law, regardless of their position.
- National Security Implications: While the immediate concern lies in identifying those responsible for the cocaine, the investigation must also assess any potential threats to national security. The presence of illicit substances within the White House raises questions about possible vulnerabilities that could be exploited for nefarious purposes. It is vital that the investigation examines any links between the drugs and national security risks, ensuring appropriate measures are taken to safeguard the country’s safety and information.
- Rebuilding Trust and Restoring Integrity: The investigation’s outcome will have far-reaching implications for the reputation of the White House. The administration must demonstrate a commitment to transparency, accountability, and rectifying any flaws in the security protocols. It is crucial to restore public trust in the institution by actively addressing the situation, holding responsible parties accountable, and implementing necessary changes to prevent future incidents.
Conclusion: The investigation into the cocaine found within the White House carries immense significance beyond the scope of illegal drugs. It is a pivotal moment to assess the security measures, hold individuals accountable, and uphold the integrity of the institution. By conducting a transparent and impartial investigation, the White House can rebuild public trust, strengthen its security protocols, and reaffirm its commitment to the highest standards of professionalism and ethical conduct. Only by uncovering the truth and taking appropriate actions can the White House regain its standing as a symbol of governance and inspire confidence in the American people.
I don’t know about you, but I’m underwhelmed. It reads like a position paper written by a committee of Republicans who are feigning interest while trying to look busy. Did you notice what ISN’T mentioned in that “blog” post?
Hunter Biden. Wouldn’t you think that the central suspect would be fair game? But NOoooOO, it’s kept as sterile as a hospital room.
Worse, it’s written as though we’re still operating under the rules of the old regime. “By conducting a transparent and impartial investigation, the White House can rebuild public trust, strengthen its security protocols, and reaffirm its commitment to the highest standards of professionalism and ethical conduct.” This adminstration is the farthest thing from the “highest standards” of “professionalism and ethical conduct.”
Of all the excuses offered by the Secret Service to explain why they shut down the White House cocaine investigation last week after just 11 days, one jumped out as particularly ridiculous.
They couldn’t conduct interviews of potential cokeheads known to be in the vicinity of where the bag of drugs was found, because they didn’t want to infringe on their civil rights, Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi told NBC.
“We have no evidence to approach them,” he said of 500 possible suspects identified in the area on the holiday weekend before July 4.
Hah! Tell that to the hundreds of people rounded up by the FBI for just being in the vicinity of the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Sorry, nobody believes that the Biden administration cares about safeguarding civil liberties unless it’s part of a coverup.
It looks like I’ll have to keep writing my own blog posts. At least until AI platforms develop a healthy dose of skepticism and snark.