Daily Broadside | How to Stay Sane in an Era of Insanity

Daily Verse | Mark 16:6
“You are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who was crucified. He has risen! He is not here. See the place where they laid him.”

Tuesday’s Reading: Luke 1-4

Happy Tuesday, my friends. I had never imagined a hot pink bassoon — until just now.

I recognize that most of what I write about is the latest political or cultural outrage, of which there seems to be an endless supply. I’ve been blogging here five days a week for 18 months and I’m never out of material. I mostly decry the devolution of America, the greatest nation ever to exist on the earth, perpetuated by a degenerate generation of junior commies and their progeny who have trashed our inheritance as unworthy of them. Chief among them is the mentally unfit charlatan in the White House and his despicable entourage.

Saturating ourselves in the world of politics and culture can lead to stress, worry and anxiety if we don’t have a strong faith. That’s why I say that I write about faith, culture and politics, in that order, because politics is downstream of culture, and culture is downstream of faith. As faith goes, so goes culture; as culture goes, so goes politics.

If a society has an abundant population of people who trust God and seek to follow him in their daily lives, the culture will reflect that. If a society has an abundance of people who believe in themselves and the power of the state, the culture will reflect that.

The less faith there is, the less a culture will embrace faith and the less the politics will reflect faith. That’s just logic.

However, it’s true that even in a culture that is outright hostile to the concept of God, there will be people of faith. For them, the diagram is going to look a little different. Instead of their faith influencing the culture at large (which is less likely, but not impossible, in a secular society), they will have to resist the corrosive effects of culture and politics on their faith.

I think this is true in two distinct ways. First, we need to prevent the corrosion of core doctrines.

[An elder] must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it. (Titus 1:9)

For instance, the Bible says that all of human life is made in the image of God. Unfortunately, the world says that babies are expendable, based on the decision of the mother. Some Christians have embraced the definition of a child as a ‘choice,’ not as gift from God.

The creation of man and woman and a marriage joining them together is the example we see in scripture. Some Christians have adopted the world’s belief that ‘marriage’ can be between two or more members of the same sex.

These and other corrosive teachings have found their way into the church and need to be expunged.

The second way we need to resist the corrosive effects of culture and politics on our faith is by fixing our eyes on the author and perfecter of our faith, Jesus Christ (Hebrews 12:2). We see this most vividly in the account of Peter asking Jesus to call him to walk on the water during a storm on the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 14:22-33).

And in the fourth watch of the night [Jesus] came to them, walking on the sea. But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, and said, “It is a ghost!” and they cried out in fear. But immediately Jesus spoke to them, saying, “Take heart; it is I. Do not be afraid.”

And Peter answered him, “Lord, if it is you, command me to come to you on the water.” He said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat and walked on the water and came to Jesus. But when he saw the wind, he was afraid, and beginning to sink he cried out, “Lord, save me.” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and took hold of him, saying to him, “O you of little faith, why did you doubt?”

It is so easy to get caught up in the ‘wind and waves’ of the cultural storm we’re living in. If we take this account of Peter’s act of faith as a model, though, I imagine it would look like this:

We can notice the wind and the waves, but they don’t need to cause us fear or to be chastised for “little faith” if we keep our eyes fixed on Jesus. Anyway, that’s how I try to manage my way through this season of our country’s history and hope that the blog reflects that.

As I place before you the latest outrage, remember that we live in a secular society that doesn’t know Christ, so we can’t expect something different from them. At the same time, it’s okay to point out the hypocrisy and double-standards and unconstitutional policies and actions we see.

Just keep your eyes locked on that horizon.

Daily Broadside | You’re Not the Result of Time + Chance

Daily Verse | Ezekiel 37:26
I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant.

It’s Thursday and I want you to know that guy over there in the shades wants you to play pickleball with him.

Let’s take a break from the political world and the ongoing disaster that is the Biden administration, and look at the question of how we got here, with “we” meaning human beings. I don’t assume that all of you who read this blog believe in God or, conversely, that you all believe in the theory of evolution.

Frankly, I don’t know what you believe.

I suppose that for a lot of people, the question of where “life” came from, and specifically human life, might not even find its way to the forefront in their thinking. We just “are” and we muddle along as best we can. But lots of people wonder about it; even NASA is wondering if “life” once existed on Mars and, if so, how it got there.

I don’t dabble much in apologetics on this blog, which has a much tighter focus on politics, but it does have a relationship to what I write about. I believe that almost everything we see happening in our culture today is the result of an abandonment of the centrality of God — and, specifically, of Jesus Christ — by our society.

I say that this blog is an examination of the intersection of faith, culture and politics. If you read my brief “About” page, you’ll see that I believe that culture is a reflection of faith, and politics is a reflection of culture.

I follow Jesus Christ and come at life as an evangelical Christian. It’s from that perspective that I comment on national politics and American culture. If politics is downstream from culture (as Andrew Breitbart believed), then culture is downstream from faith. In fact, said Richard John Neuhaus, “Culture is the root of politics, and religion is the root of culture.”

So if culture reflects the faith (or lack thereof) in a society, then it’s important to understand the reasons for why a society either embraces or rejects faith. And that’s the connection to apologetics, which is not about saying, “sorry,” but about defending the Christian faith with reason, facts and logic.

Are there solid reasons to believe in the God of the Bible?

Biblically-grounded Christians believe that God created the whole universe ex nihilo, out of nothing, including human beings, as Genesis 1:27 testifies:

So God created mankind in his own image,
    in the image of God he created them;
    male and female he created them.

If true, that means there is a personal, powerful and creative Being who designed men and women and the environment they inhabit. Also, if true, it seems like we should expect to see evidence of design in the creation.

On the other hand, the secular alternative to the Creation narrative is that life spontaneously arose out of nothing. Life is the result of pure chance over billions of years with no Designer involved or even necessary.

One of the factors to consider as we try to determine whether the biblical account is truthful or whether the evolutionists are correct is the complexity of what we see around us. Is it rational or logical to think that the incredible intricacies and complexity we find in our world is the result of random mutations and impersonal chance over time? Or is it more rational to see that there must have been an intelligence behind the creation?

Mark Tapscott over at HillFaith.org posted an interesting link to an article in Quanta Magazine that discusses the complexity of just a single neuron. Three researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem trained an artificial neural network to imitate a biological neuron. They were shocked at their findings.

[The researchers] trained an artificial deep neural network to mimic the computations of a simulated biological neuron. They showed that a deep neural network requires between five and eight layers of interconnected “neurons” to represent the complexity of one single biological neuron.

Even the authors did not anticipate such complexity. “I thought it would be simpler and smaller,” said Beniaguev. He expected that three or four layers would be enough to capture the computations performed within the cell.

Like Tapscott, I’m no scientist and don’t pretend to be one. But I can read, and what this tells me is that the sheer complexity of a single neuron far surpasses what even some of our smartest scientists assumed about them.

Tapscott goes on to suggest that “one tentative conclusion suggested by the Quanta Magazine piece and the study it describes might be expressed with something like this: Greater complexity reduces the probability of a chance explanation for the existence of a single biological cell and increases the necessity for intelligent design as the explanation.

Intelligent Design theory posits that there must be an intelligence behind all that we see, but does not specifically name the Christian God as that intelligence (although it’s inferred). The Intelligent Design movement is led by luminaries such as Michael J. Behe (Darwin’s Black Box) and William A. Dembski (The Design Revolution).

Tapscott goes on to quote retired mathematics lecturer Julie Hannah:

In general, there is a problem with the popular belief that infinity renders anything possible. For example, monkeys typing for an infinite length of time are supposed to eventually type out any given text, but if there are 50 keys, the probability of producing just one given five-letter word is

Julie Hannah equation

This is a tremendously low probability, and it decreases exponentially when letters are added. A computer program that simulated random typing once produced nineteen consecutive letters and characters that appear in a line of a Shakespearean play, but this result took 42,162,500,000 billion years to achieve!

In other words, the probability that such complexity as we see in our universe is the result of chance + time is essentially zero “in any operational sense.”

This is not just true about a single biological neuron, but about the universe as a whole. “The physicist Lee Smolin has calculated that the odds of life-compatible numbers coming up by chance is 1 in 10229.” That number is nearly incomprehensible (1 followed by 229 zeroes):

10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Even in the face of odds like that, some people refuse to concede that it’s possible there’s a Designer. So they persist in their claims that they just haven’t discovered the incontrovertible evidence that is necessary to “prove” that the universe was formed by chance.

Back to my earlier questions: Is it rational or logical to think that the incredible intricacies and complexity we find in our world is the result of random mutations and impersonal chance over time? Or is it more rational to see that there must have been an intelligence behind the creation?

When we abandon reason and logic (one chance in 10229 means, for all intents and purposes, impossible) in favor of ideological presumptions (there is no god), we become untethered from fact and veer into conjecture. From there we begin to draw assumptions about the meaning of life that align with our worldview. If our existence is the result of random mutations and chance, then there is no god and no reason to adhere to biblical principles or consider them superior to any other set of life principles.

While over-simplified, that’s how we got to where we are today as a society and a culture. It’s the wholesale rejection of Jesus Christ at the center of our lives.

What do you think? Agree or disagree?