Daily Broadside | No Joke: They Really Are Coming For Your Children

So over the last couple of days I’ve been chronicling the filthy behavior of the Alphabet mafia during their so-called “Pride” events across the US and Canada. I’ve noted that barely clothed and fully naked men have been gyrating or bicycling or twerking in public with children present.

And the children are present with parents who either don’t care about the psychological damage such exposure will do to their kids or are simply too weak to resist being carried along by the open sewer running down the middle of our culture.

Worst of all, the sexual anarchists aren’t hiding that they are targeting our children.

LGBTQ activists participating in New York City’s annual Drag March on Friday sparked outrage for chanting “we’re here, we’re queer, we’re coming for your children” in a Manhattan park.

The marchers, many wearing flamboyant dresses and clothing, walked through Tompkins Square Park in the East Village Friday night as part of the city’s Pride Month celebrations.

Video of the march shows people laughing and joining in with the cheeky chant — including one dancing topless woman.

C’mon, guys. It’s just a “cheeky chant.”

Seriously.

A little naughty nothing to worry about. No big deal.

Many online users pointed out that the chant was more than likely a joke in response to accusations of pedophilia among the drag community from the right.

We’re just joking. LOL!

We’re not really coming for your children. We’re just mocking the totally unjustified stereotype you conservatives have of us. It’s your fault H8er!

What the reaction to the declaration that “we’re coming for your children” tells me is that there’s still a wide swath of the American public that does not accept homosexuality and transgenderism as “normal.” They only “accept” it because the state has told them to accept it. They only “accept” it because they no longer have the cultural weight to oppose it.

Another part of it is that no one wants someone else usurping the role of parent in a child’s life. Atheists and the irreligious don’t want Christians telling their kids about Jesus. Christians don’t want secular humanists telling their kids about evolution. And nobody wants sexual deviants telling their kids about fisting or tucking and binding.

Especially a stranger.

Any parent would feel offended when someone else undermines their authority by teaching their children something the parent wouldn’t. It’s a shocking loss of control that threatens the parent. That’s why parents are showing up to school board meetings to express their outrage about middle school teachers groomers.

But it’s more than that.

It’s that parents don’t accept homosexuality and transgenderism personally. They don’t accept it morally. And they sure as heck don’t want some godless hedonist influencing or molesting their children. They don’t want someone screwing up their kid’s moral center or their emotional stability.

Most of us have accepted that homosexuality has been mainstreamed. We’ve had our misgivings about where such integration into the culture would lead and warned that once we gave an inch, we could expect that other dominoes would fall. And now here we are with transgenderism already forcing itself toward normalization while drawing p3d0philia in its wake.

Disturbing details in the arrest of the nation’s first elected transgender legislator and a Massachusetts preschool worker on child exploitation and pornography charges have been released by the United States Department of Homeland Security.

Former New Hampshire State Rep. Stacie-Marie Laughton, a Democrat from Nashua and Lindsay Groves, a caregiver at the Creative Minds Learning Center in Tyngsboro, were both arrested and charged last week with multiple counts of child exploitation and distribution of child pornography. 

Laughton made history back in 2012 when she was elected as the first transgender lawmaker in the United States. She was elected to the New Hampshire House of Representatives.

The arrests of Laughton and Groves were initiated by the Nashua Police Department, but because of the nature of the crimes, it has been transferred to HSI for federal prosecution.

According to a report  based on a preliminary investigation into the case by a Homeland Security criminal investigator, Groves bragged in text messages that  she used  “natural bathroom breaks” at the daycare center prior to “naptime” to take photos of children’s genitals.

Special agent Rocco Rauseo said he was able to determine that the children allegedly exploited by Laughton and Groves are between the ages of 3 and 5. 

No joke.

Daily Broadside | U.N. Brings Pedophilia A Step Closer to “Normal” in New Report

Yesterday long-time Baptist minister, televangelist and one-time president of the Southern Baptist Convention, Charles Stanley, died at the age of 90.

He had been the pastor of First Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia since 1971. I remember regularly listening to his radio program, In Touch with Charles Stanley, in the late 80s, especially as I considered vocational ministry after college. His ministry wasn’t without controversy, his wife having divorced him in 2000 after multiple attempts at reconciliation. His son, Andy Stanley, leads another megachurch in Atlanta called North Point Community Church.

If you haven’t yet heard, the United Nations affirmed its support of pedophilia in a report titled “The 8 March Principles for a Human Rights-Based Approach to Criminal Law Proscribing Conduct Associated with Sex, Reproduction, Drug Use, HIV, Homelessness and Poverty.”

A shocking report issued by international legal experts with the backing of the United Nations appears to open the floodgates to normalize sex with minors. 

“Sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law,” the Geneva-based International Commission of Jurists wrote in March with an assist from UNAIDS and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

This follows on the heels of a number of disturbing developments.

The shocking recommendations from international legal elites underscore a number of major recent events in the United States and around the world that have unfolded with bewildering speed. 

Each development suggests people in positions of authority have worked to break traditional legal bounds, societal structures and once-universal taboos for the purpose of sexualizing children.

Among them: The disturbing case of Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of running an international prostitution ring, reportedly provided underage girls to global power players.

There is also the sudden dramatic rise in the number of transgender people and normalization of transgender culture, fueled by popular culture and public education, defying all known historic precedent. 

In addition, educators in many instances now brazenly state that parents have limited rights over their children while their classrooms grow increasingly sexualized. 

What is it with these Leftist pinko commie elites and their obsession with sexual perversion and the destruction of all sexual norms?

Cheong links indirectly to the document, which you can find here; I’ve screenshotted the relevant pages below.

So this is interesting, because “Principle 16” doesn’t give any minimum age of consent — it just says “persons under 18 years of age.” Does that mean that we should consult a five-year-old about whether he wants to have sex with a 51-year-old man? And don’t throw at me the “due regard to their age, maturity and best interests” (whatever that means) — these are very subjective markers. How does one evaluate “maturity” or “best interests”?

Note too the way it’s positioned: for the benefit of children. The “enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity” of anyone under the age of 18 … those people currently referred to as “underage” for a reason.

Some of the groups involved in this five-year endeavor of evil include the usual suspects of global Marxism: the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the UN Development Programme (UNDP), and of course, no global nod to legal pederasty would be complete without the World Health Organization (WHO).

Again, this comes as parents in the U.S. fight LGBTQ+ groomers in school classrooms, pornographic books in school libraries, and drag queen shows at public libraries and in the classroom.

We’re watching the unraveling of our society right in front of our eyes. All of us should be drawing immovable red lines in our hearts and minds.

It always starts subtly, then grows larger and more obnoxious once it has a foothold.

Daily Broadside | Depraved Luxury Brand Sells Sex with Children

Daily Verse | 1 Corinthians 15:46
The spiritual did not come first, but the natural, and after that, the spiritual.

Monday’s Reading: 2 Corinthians 1-5

Happy Monday and thanks for joining me. Our Thanksgiving guests are safely on their way back to their current homes and the Christmas lights are up at mine.

Black Friday has been extended through the weekend and today is Cyber Monday, the first volley of a non-stop effort to part you from your money from now until Christmas.

Hopefully you’ll avoid super luxury brand Balenciaga.

High-fashion brand Balenciaga is facing backlash for an ad campaign that features photos of child models holding teddy bears dressed in bondage gear; the brand also used an image of a Supreme Court opinion in a child pornography case as a prop promoting a handbag.

Backlash was swift and loud.

Penny Nance, CEO of Concerned Women for America, a conservative women’s rights group, called the images “exploitive propaganda.”

“This is not about them being provocative and getting attention,” Nance said in an interview with Fox News Digital. “The entire campaign sexualizes children, period. It is child exploitation, period. And it feeds and normalizes a culture that is dark and depraved.”

That’s true. Not only does it feed a culture that is dark and depraved, it pushes that hunger for depravity further. There is a concerted effort to normalize the sexual exploitation of children, especially for pederasts.

There were two concurrent campaigns for Balenciaga’s products and each drew heavy condemnation. The first involved a partially-covered document from a Supreme Court decision about the sale of child pornography, while the second involved images of children holding teddy bears that were “dressed” in bondage gear.

One child stood on a couch while holding a purple teddy bear which was dressed in a bondage outfit, including leather straps wrapped around its neck connected to ruffled thigh straps, according to online screenshots. In another photo, a different child stood in front of a table of Balenciaga merchandise holding another bondage teddy bear; this stuffed animal wore a mesh shirt, had leather straps tied around its ankles and wrists along with a choker around its neck with a metal padlock attached. This bear also appeared to have dyed fur like that of a black eye.

Kim Kardashian, certainly no role model, condemned the images and left her future association with the brand in doubt.

“I have been quiet for the past few days, not because I haven’t been disgusted and outraged by the recent Balenciaga campaigns, but because I wanted an opportunity to speak to their team to understand for myself how this could have happened,” she shared across her social media platforms.

“As a mother of four, I have been shaken by the disturbing images. The safety of children must be held with the highest regard and any attempts to normalize child abuse of any kind should have no place in our society — period.”

Last year’s Super Bowl MVP and follower of Jesus, Cooper Kupp, also spoke out against the disgusting ad campaign.

Balenciaga apologized for the depraved content and deleted the brand’s Instagram posts.

“We apologize for displaying unsettling documents in our campaign. We take this matter very seriously and are taking legal action against the parties responsible for creating the set and including unapproved items for our Spring 23 campaign photoshoot,” a brand statement published on Instagram read. “We strongly condemn abuse of children in any form. We stand for children safety and well-being.”

In United States v. Williams, the Supreme Court ruled that it was not a violation of the First Amendment to prosecute individuals pandering the sale of child pornography without actually possessing such material.

But it was also a partial win because the court ruled that ruled that “virtual child pornography,” which does not use actual children in its production, could not be criminalized. So you could have a child pornographer using created images to peddle their filth and they couldn’t be prosecuted for it.

The other part of their apology was regarding the images of children with the bondage bears.

Balenciaga simultaneously apologized for a separate but concurrent ad campaign that featured photos of child models holding teddy bears dressed in bondage gear.

“We sincerely apologize for any offense our holiday campaign may have caused. Our plush bear bags should not have been featured with children in this campaign. We have immediately removed the campaign from all platforms,” read a separate post from Balenciaga. 

Sort of a soft apology considering the “crime.” They apologize “for any offense” their ads “may have caused”? I read that as, “we didn’t mean to offend anyone and are really surprised that people were offended.”

Seriously?

I would’ve expected them to denounce the ads in the strongest possible terms, apologized profusely for allowing such garbage to slip by their marketing department, and announced that several employees in the marketing and PR departments had been dismissed from the company immediately. Not to mention the photographer.

We live in a morally depraved society and it’s now the family that is on the defensive, not the marketers or the companies peddling this $#!+.

Remember, these companies live and die on their earnings. Starve them of revenue and profit and they’ll go out of business.