Daily Broadside | Our Garbage Media Hides a Certain Class of Criminals to Protect Its Narrative

Ann Coulter proved her cultural literacy creds after telling Bill Maher that “we know” the Kansas City shooters aren’t white males. Maher, of course, mocked her for her “hubris” throughout her explanation.

Maher: “We don’t officially know. You know — you have special powers.”

Van Jones: *smirk*

You know why they act like that? It’s because they’re indoctrinated into Right ThinkTM. They’re all so smarmy with their stylish suits and know-it-all demeanors that they can’t bring themselves to break with the official progressive narrative — the story that white people are racist terrorist supremacists, and black people are poor oppressed innocents.

Can’t have anybody learning that blacks are sometimes criminals too, yaknow.

Coulter has the last laugh, though.

The “media” is getting dragged, too, for refusing to release the names or images of the “TEENS” in spite of the fact that they usually have no problem releasing names, images, school information, social media posts, addresses and anything else they can throw to the wind if it wrecks a white male.

A news release from the Jackson County Family Court said the juveniles are being detained in the county’s Juvenile Detention Center on gun-related and resisting arrest charges. Additional charges are expected as the investigation continues.

No further information was released. Defendants age 17 and under in Missouri are typically adjudicated through the juvenile system, which is far more private than the system for adults. Names of the accused are not released, nor are police documents such as probable cause statements.

In cases involving serious crimes such as murder, juveniles as young as 12 can be certified for trial as adults, said Lynn Urban, a professor who chairs the Criminal Justice and Criminology Department at the University of Central Missouri.

Missouri may have different practices, but you know if the shooters were white, there’d be leaks and the Legacy Media would splash their names and photos all over the front pages.

To be clear, two adults have been named and charged in connection with the shooting.

Two adults have been arrested in connection with the mass shooting at the Chiefs’ Super Bowl parade last week, prosecutors announced Tuesday.

Dominic Miller and Lyndell Mays each face charges of second-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon, Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker said, noting that paradegoer Lisa Lopez-Galvan was fatally shot by a bullet from Miller’s gun.

I can tell you that they aren’t two white men. The fact that two teens have been arrested in connection with the gun battle and the media has suddenly become very circumspect about not naming names or race demonstrates what garbage media we have.

By the way, here’s Ann Coulter once again demonstrating her “special powers” on Bill Maher’s show back in 2015 (just watch the first ten seconds).

You’d think the guy would learn. But he’s a true believer.

Daily Broadside | Get Ready for More Fraud This November

Why, I was assured that the 2020 election was the most secure in history!

Massive voter fraud allegations that marred the 2020 election spurred a political and grassroots movement from coast to coast to pursue an array of election reforms designed to increase election integrity.

However, with just months left ahead of the 2024 election, Republicans say little was mended, especially in contested states where they thought fixes were needed most.

Much concern is centered around five key swing states that became the focus of 2020: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin.

Of course. Of course.

Democrats recoil from any election reforms that make voting more secure so that they can continue to rig the system and flood results with fake ballots. Republicans say they want more secure elections, but how will they influence states where the Democrats hold power?

Election reforms tend to follow party lines. Democrats commonly castigate increased election security measures as voter suppression, while Republicans often condemn laws and directives that loosen security as aiding and abetting voter fraud.

According to a report from the Brennan Center for Justice, a left leaning, non-profit, law and research foundation, 23 states enacted 53 laws relaxing election security restrictions in 2023, while 14 states enacted 17 laws tightening them.

The statistics suggest that Democrats are still winning the nationwide battle, as they have for the past several years. The report found the states that took the most actions to tighten election security are the places that already had security measures in place.

So, basically, nothing has changed.

Georgia state Sen. Colton Moore, a Republican, said that although improvements have been made since 2020, much meaningful work is still needed.

Nothing of substance has changed since 2020. Every mechanism to facilitate a steal is still in place,” he told The Epoch Times. “We must work to eliminate the vulnerabilities still in place today.”

Mr. Moore also highlighted the “ridiculous” number of absentee ballots still used in Georgia elections and said they ought to be restricted to military personnel and medically disabled citizens. He said he was also worried about the institutionalization of the use of absentee ballot drop boxes, which he believes should be done away with altogether.

Democrats have learned how to rig the system so that they can cheat as necessary to secure a win. Nobody except the most die-hard Leftists and uninformed progressives believe that Brandon won the 2020 presidential election with 81 million legitimate votes.

Unfortunately, it looks as though we’re about to suffer the same fate again this November, no matter who the candidate is.

Daily Broadside | Liberal San Francisco Appoints First Non-Citizen Official

Insanity.

The San Francisco Elections Commission has, for what is believed to be the first time in history, appointed someone who isn’t a U.S. citizen—who isn’t legally allowed to vote—to serve as an official.

The officer, Kelly Wong, was sworn in on Feb. 14, local news outlet KQED reported. It said that Ms. Wong, an immigrant rights advocate, is a native of Hong Kong who arrived in the United States in 2019 for graduate studies.

She was sworn in by Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin during a ceremony at San Francisco City Hall after winning unanimous support from the board.

There’s so much Wong with this, starting with the fact that she isn’t even a citizen of the United States. Kelly Wing Kwan Wong* is NOT AN AMERICAN — but she’s now a public official overseeing elections in an American city.

How does this even happen?!

The appointment of a noncitizen to city boards, commissions, and advisory bodies was made possible in 2020 when voters passed a proposal by lawmakers to remove the standing requirement that candidates seeking office hold U.S. citizenship.

Oh.

We’re checking her credentials, right? I mean, she’s a Chinese immigrant from Hong Kong who came here in 2019 to pursue a graduate degree. Does anyone know if she’s here LEGALLY? Is this a “woman from China overstays her student visa and is now a government official” situation?

Also, China is a communist nation and owns Hong Kong now. Do we know if she’s a member of the CCP?

We do know that she’s an activist. Her LinkedIn profile says, “I have devoted my career to championing immigrant rights and equity and inclusion.” You can also access her capstone paper called, “Exploring Racial Microaggressions Toward Chinese Immigrant Women in Greater Boston During Covid.”

Perfect. A noncitizen grievance monger activist has now been given power to review elections in one of the most regressive cities in America. Why would a city do this to themselves and to America (because you know this won’t stay localized in San Francisco)?

Because diversity, that’s why.

The significance of Wong’s role extends beyond her personal achievements, signaling a broader shift towards inclusivity within San Francisco’s political landscape. In a city where immigrants constitute a substantial portion of the population, Wong’s representation on the Elections Commission sends a powerful message about the city’s commitment to embracing diversity at every level of governance. Her focus on increasing engagement within immigrant communities is expected to boost voter turnout, thereby enriching the democratic process with a wider array of perspectives and voices.

How much you want to bet that “increasing engagement within immigrant communities” will boost voter turnout for DEMOCRATS? How much do you want to be that the majority of “immigrants” are not here legally? How much do you want to bet that illegal immigrants will be voting this November, if they’re not already in the system?

The appointment of Kelly Wong is a sign that we’re a dying nation. If you don’t respect your own country, putting non-citizen “diversity” hires over actual native Americans, in order to appeal to “immigrants,” why should anyone else respect your country?

Daily Broadside | Our Senators Missed the Super Bowl For This, You Guys!

The men and women you send to Washington work really, really hard for … well, I was going to say, “you,” but you don’t believe that, do you?

Do you?

The Senate passed a $95 billion national security supplemental package to assist Ukraine, Israel and the Indo-Pacific after a tedious procedural process that came to an end early Tuesday morning.

The final vote was 70 to 29, with 22 Republicans voting yes. Democratic Sens. Peter Welch and Jeff Merkley, plus independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, voted no.

That’s NINETY-FIVE BILLION DOLLARS. On top of $120 BILLION DOLLARS we’ve already sent to Ukraine. On top of $34 TRILLION DOLLARS OF U.S. DEBT that our esteemed rulers have laid on the backs of the American middle class from now until who knows when.

Do you known how much ONE TRILLION is? A trillion is one thousand billion — or one million million. A billion is one thousand million. A million is one thousand thousand.

So let’s count to a billion. To do that, count to a million one thousand times. Remember, a million comes right after 999,999. To count to a million once, you have to count to 999,999, then add one.

If you count one number per second, you’ll be done in about 11.5 days (no stops for eating, potty breaks, or sleeping!). To be precise, to count to a million it will take you 11 days, 13 hours, 46 minutes, and 40 seconds. 

Go.

Done? Great! You counted to a million. But you only counted to one million once. To count to a billion, you need to count to one million 999 more times. Not 100 more times. Not 563 more times. Not 881 more times.

999 more times. 999 more 11.5-day periods of counting.

Go.

Done? But wait! You’re not done! Let’s say that you just counted to one million one thousand times. Yay! Good for you — you’ve reached a billion, yes — but you’ve only done that once. To reach the number of one dollar bills that the Senate just decided to give to other countries — not America — you need to count to one million one thousand times 95 times!

In other words, you need to count to one million 94,999 more times.

Go ahead. I’ll wait.

In the meantime, you might want to look at this graphic (based on this graphic) to give you a sense of scale, in case counting doesn’t do it for you.

That speck up there represents a thousand thousand (a million). And that small rectangle represents a thousand million (a billion). And the gigantic square represents a thousand billion (a trillion). Our national debt is about 34 of those gigantic squares.

And our treasonous $enators just layered 95 more of those rectangles on top of those 34 squares.

Here’s the best part: none of that money is going to Americans. None of it is going to you, or to me, or to any other American citizen. And not for anything that matters to you or to me or to anyone else here in this country.

Oh, no. That money is going to Ukraine (about $60 billion of it) and the rest is going to Israel and Taiwan.

Funny how our illustrious $enators in “the world’s greatest deliberative body” haven’t found any money to build a wall along our southern border, but they can find NINETY-FIVE BILLION DOLLARS to send to our frenz all over the world. They can’t find money to build new ships for our Navy, or buy more ammo for our military, but they can find NINETY-FIVE BILLION DOLLARS to give to more of our frenz in Eastern Europe or the Middle East or the Far East.

Don’t get me wrong — I don’t have a problem supporting Israel or arming Taiwan BUT I DO HAVE A PROBLEM DOING THAT WHILE BEING INVADED BY FOREIGNERS ACROSS OUR SOUTHERN BORDER.

Yet 22 Republican $enators, including the traitor Mitch McConnell, voted with the Democrats in the $enate to squeeze this monstrosity out its gaseous cavity known as the $enate chamber.

Let me ask you something: when was the last time your $enators or Representatives did something tangible for you. Something that gave you more freedom or let you keep more of your money.

Hmm? When?

They haven’t and they won’t. They hand out money to bad actors like Zelensky who is awash in American taxpayer dollars. You think that’s all going to his war with Russia? Maybe some of it. But it’s being laundered and making its way into his pockets and into our ruling class’s pockets.

Our $enators don’t work for you or for me.

They work for themselves and their globalist masters, and it’s long past time to kick them all to the curb.

Every last one of them.

Vote accordingly.

Daily Broadside | You’re In the Way of the Globalists

I’ve never been a fan of the United Nations, especially since it is anything but a neutral organization on the world stage. The United States funds nearly 20 percent of the UN budget, the UN sits on prime beach front property in their building in NYC—and what do they do for us? What do we get out of the UN?

I’ll tell you what we get: we get an organization using our money and our land to orchestrate an invasion of our country by third world nations. They are plotting with the White House to flood our nation with the world’s poor.

The UN, as my last essay on the border pointed out, is actively staging an invasion of the Southern border of the United States, weaponizing cynically the bodies of millions of people. There is, believe it or not, $372 million from the UN, funding a “voucher system” to support illegal migration into the US.

Readers must understand that this is an act of war, since the UN has, by doing this, gone from being (or at least claiming to be) a neutral global arbiter, to being a supranational body that is using its immense power and resources to wage war on the laws and policies and national sovereignty of a specific member state.

This is unprecedented.

The UN is not supposed to be an activist destroying a nation’s borders. It is not supposed to carve up countries, or depopulate and repopulate, against national laws, whole regions.

Unbelievably, the UN, along with aligned puppet NGOs, is coordinating with the White House to manage this extraordinary flow of humanity into the United States. These documents can be hard to follow, as they cover up rhetorically who is going where, and why; but the UN, with the collaboration of the White House, is managing the movements of millions of people: via aid to Honduras, and via complex and highly funded staging areas in Guatemala, with a stated goal of getting millions, especially children with tenuous connections to sponsors, into the United States.

That’s from Naomi Wolf’s latest column. (Wolf, as I’ve written before, was a well-known liberal feminist who has undergone an eye-opening awakening over the last couple of years since COVID. While I wouldn’t say she’s a conservative (yet!) she’s being red-pilled and probably has more in common with conservatives than with liberals now.)

Here’s what’s even worse: the White House is coordinating with the UN to manage this extraordinary flow of illegal aliens into the United States. This is treason of the highest order. This isn’t some individual elected official enriching himself by selling state secrets to our enemies (although don’t be so sure someone isn’t getting rich off of this). This is an administration which is SUBVERTING THE NATIONAL IDENTITY OF THE VERY COUNTRY THEY ARE CHARGED WITH PROTECTING AND GOVERNING BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION (and even that is suspect given the steal of the national election in 2020).

You, if you are reading this, are being replaced. You are being pushed aside in favor of foreigners who have no intention of becoming “Americanized.”

Normal Americans—birthright citizens—are being dispossessed of the land of their birth through an intentional displacement orchestrated by traitors at the very pinnacles of power. Your children are being marginalized by an intentional act of subversion. You are being betrayed by globalists who hate the United States as founded. Those globalists include political apparatchiks in the halls of Congress and the White House.

You are being deceived and lied to by those in power while you’re distracted by the Circus because you represent the individual and freedom.

Daily Broadside | DOJ Prosecutes Trump Over Missing Document But Lets Brandon Skate Because “Diminished Faculties”

Via Ace of Spades.

WASHINGTON — Special counsel Robert Hur has declined to prosecute President Joe Biden for his handling of classified documents but said in a report released Thursday that Biden’s practices “present serious risks to national security” and added that part of the reason he wouldn’t charge Biden was that the president could portray himself as an “elderly man with a poor memory” who would be sympathetic to a jury.

“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” the report said, but added that the evidence “does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

I see. So Brandon’s “elderly” age and “poor memory” is a mitigating factor when considering criminal charges, but not when he’s RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

The report from Hur — who previously appointed by former President Donald Trump as one of the country’s top federal prosecutors — also made clear the “material distinctions” between a theoretical case against Biden and the pending case against Trump for his handling of classified documents, noting the “serious aggravating facts” in Trump’s case.

Yes, “serious aggravating facts” such as Trump’s an “America First” kind of guy and threatens the oligarchy running our country. Or that he’s a Republican. And that he does what is right for the patriotic men and women of Main Street America.

“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” it said. “Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”

As Ace explains:

There you go — his impaired cognitive state precludes him from having the culpable mental state of willfulness required by the crime.

Just a refresher, crimes have both an actus reus — the culpable act — and a mens rea — the culpable mind. If you’re out hunting and you accidentally shoot a man wearing a brown coat, mistaking him for a deer, you can’t be prosecuted for murder, which requires intent as a mental state (or such extreme recklessness that shows a depraved indifference to human life).

This particular crime requires “wilfulness,” which is an intermediate mental state, short of “intent,” but a couple of steps above mere negligence (aka carelessness, lack of concern over something the law demands you have concern and care about). It’s something like, “you may or may not have intended to do this thing, but you acted so unconcerned that your actions would result in this thing that we call you ‘willful’ with respect to your indifference to the outcome of your actions.”

Like if you get smashed-out drunk and go for a drive. You may not have intended to kill the person you wind up running over, but you made a series of decisions which were willful in their indifference to the very real possibility you’d kill someone.

Note this doesn’t mean that Biden didn’t have intent — just that the law doesn’t require it. A “higher” mental state, like intent, is always sufficient to satisfy the requirement of a lower one, like willfulness.

But the law says that the state doesn’t have to prove you intended to retain classified information — just that your actions were likely to result in this outcome, and you willfully chose to take those actions anyway.

Instead of prosecuting the crime, the DOJ forecloses that possibility by simply saying, “No one is going to convict him. He’s just a well-intentioned old man who, gosh darn it, had a lapse of memory. Besides, isn’t he cool in those aviator sun glasses?”

This is proof positive that we have an unaccountable organized mob running our country that protects its own and applies the full force of the law to its political enemies. We are no longer living in a “free” country where the rulers fear the people. We live in a country where the people are beginning to fear those in power, who are no longer checked by the law.

Every institution has been captured by the Left and rabid Marxists, and we won’t be able to vote our way out of this.

Have a good weekend.

Daily Broadside | So Claims of Cheating Were Right: Trump Actually Won in 2020

In the run-up to the presidential election of 2016, I was NOT a fan of Donald J. Trump. I didn’t like him because he was loud, abrasive, mean, and had a habit of running his stream-of-consciousness mouth off and boasting about all the winning we would do and how he’d get Mexico to pay for his big, beautiful wall without explaining any of it.

But I also had some private admiration for the man. He had the cojones to raise his hand when Bret Baier asked if any of the Republican candidates for president wouldn’t commit to supporting the eventual nominee. Remember that?

Like him or not, Trump was his own man and completely shook up the establishment in 2016.

After watching him for four years and waking up to the deep state and the vile Obiden team, I enthusiastically voted for Trump, only to watch the election be stolen from me and the other millions of Americans who voted for him.

I’ll never forget the comment that someone wrote at me (yes, “at me”) when I expressed my disbelief that our current administration had legitimately won with “81 million” votes for a guy that campaigned from his basement while Trump was hosting packed stadiums.

She wrote, “That many people hated Trump so much that they voted for Biden.”

No way. No way am I believing that. There were so many credible reports of fraud, not to mention all those votes counted after polling closed as reams of ballots were pulled out from under tables and fed into tabulation machines.

I watched as courts, which should have known better, refuse to hear the lawsuits filed as evidence piled up. I was told that “even judges appointed by Republicans” were refusing to take the cases, as if a judge appointed by a Republican was somehow an unimpeachable fact.

I write all that as prologue because now comes a report that basically proves what I and millions of others have claimed all along: that the 2020 election was stolen and Joe Biden is a fraudulent “president.”

With the 2024 election season in full swing, and a Trump-Biden rematch appearing likely, Americans deserve to know that mail-in voting fraud likely changed the outcome of the 2020 election. In recent years, mail-in voting has become more commonplace. However, in 2020, mail-in voting reached an all-time record due to pandemic policies encouraging mail-in voting.

These abrupt and capricious changes to voting procedures in the months before the 2020 election occurred despite the fact that ample evidence showed that mass mail-in voting, unsecure ballot drop boxes, ballot harvesting, and lack of signature verification would result in a flood of fraudulent ballots that would undermine the accuracy of the election results.

A groundbreaking poll conducted by The Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports in November/December 2023 attempted to assess the degree of fraudulent voting that may have taken place. The results were stunning. Some of the most important findings from the poll include:

  • 21% of mail-in voters admitted that in 2020 they voted in a state where they are “no longer a permanent resident.”
  • 21% of mail-in voters admitted that they filled out a ballot for a friend or family member
  • 17% of mail-in voters said they signed a ballot for a friend or family member “with or without his or her permission.”
  • 19% of mail-in voters said that a friend or family member filled out their ballot, in part or in full, on their behalf.

Cleanest, fairest, most transparent election in history!

After examining the raw survey data provided by Rasmussen, we found that 28.2% of all mail-in respondents admitted to committing at least one of the four types of fraud asked in the survey, meaning that more than one-in-four ballots cast by mail in 2020 were likely cast fraudulently, and thus should not have been counted.

This policy study takes the results of the Heartland/Rasmussen survey and applies them directly to the six swing states that Biden won by razor-thin margins in 2020: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Because Biden voters cast mail-in ballots at a much higher rate than Trump voters, any level of fraud almost certainly benefited Biden to a significantly greater degree than Trump.

In addition to the 28.2% fraud scenario, the study analyzes the electoral results for every fraud integer from 27% down to 1%. In every instance except the 3%, 2%, and 1% fraud scenarios, our results indicate that Trump would have won the Electoral College in the 2020 U.S. presidential election had fraudulent mail-in ballots not been counted. Hence, even if the level of fraud detected in the Heartland/Rasmussen survey (28.2% of all mail-in ballots) substantially overstated voter fraud by multiple orders of magnitude, Trump would likely still have won the 2020 election. 

Ultimately, our study clearly shows that if the 2020 election had been as free, fair, and secure as past elections have been, Donald Trump would almost certainly have been re-elected to a second term. As the country braces for a Trump-Biden rematch, it is imperative that state legislatures do all that they can to ensure the next election is as secure as possible, primarily by severely limiting mail-in voting and instituting other commonsense policies to prevent mail-in voter fraud. If state lawmakers do not pass measures to thwart the possibility of extensive voter fraud occurring again, more Americans will question the legitimacy of  future elections, further eroding the American people’s trust in our nation’s democratic institutions.

Trump had been riding a wave of a great economy, no new wars, peace agreements in the Middle East, low gas prices because we were drilling our own oil, and illegal aliens had been brought under some sort of control. And we’re supposed to think that Handsy Joe, patriarch of the Biden Crime Family, ginned up enough energy among the people to get the most votes ever recorded?

As if.

Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist testifies before Congress about the harm being done by the types of election “interference” that cost Republicans the 2020 election and threaten the 2024 election.

So…Trump won in 2020, as we all knew he did. And it will be the same in 2024 if the spineless GOP doesn’t start playing hardball with state legislatures. Fortunately, fake conservative Mitt Romney’s niece, Ronna McDaniel, who was appointed by Trump, is finally stepping down as chair of the RNC, which has consistently lost elections under her “leadership”—all while grifting off the unsuspecting, well-intentioned, good conservatives who expect Republicans to be fighting for us.

It’s not much, but it’s a start.

Daily Broadside | Political Hack and Pretend President Brandon is a Fabulist and Americans Don’t Like Him

Before I get to the meat of what I wanted to write about today, subversive anti-American Homeland “Security” Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas faces an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives today. Because Republicans have a narrow majority, it is unlikely that Mayhorkas will be impeached. Even if he is, the Senate won’t convict.

With that drama happening in the halls of the clown show that is Washington, D.C., I give you your “president”:

That’s Joe “Trunalimunumaprzure!” Biden telling his audience that after he became “president” he met with French president Francois Mitterrand and told him, “AmERiCa iS BaCk, bABy!” (slightly edited for clarity). The only difficulty with that (I mean, if you look at it from a certain angle) is that MITTERRAND HAS BEEN DEAD FOR 28 YEARS. Oh, and that Brandon referred to the dead French president as the “Chancellor of Germany.” But other than that, totally right on, Fat.

Those of you who put him in office three years ago, you go right ahead and vote for this pathetic excuse of a politician and “leader” of the free world again this November.

In the meantime you’ll have to work really hard to overcome the headwinds that your brilliant Mensa-level genius faces from president-in-exile Donald J. Trump.

President Joe Biden hit yet another new low in his approval rating (37%) in the latest NBC News poll released Sunday, raising concern of the Democrat pollster, who said the “damning” results show “a presidency in peril.”

Former President Donald Trump not only leads Biden by 5 points (47%-42%) in the national poll, but also leads by big margins:

  • 23 points on mental and physical health to be president (46%-23%)
  • 22 points on handling the economy (55%-33%)
  • 21 points on dealing with crime and violence (50%-29%)
  • 16 points on being competent and effective (48%-32%)
  • 11 points on improving America’s standing in the world (47%-36%)
  • 35 points on securing the southern border (57%-22%)

Illegal immigration has been widely deemed the No. 1 voting issue, according to exit polls in the early GOP primary states.

I’d bold those numbers to emphasize them, but they’re all great.

“On every measure compared to 2020, Biden has declined. Most damning, the belief that Biden is more likely to be up to the job — the chief tenet of the Biden candidacy — has evaporated.”

The numbers look great now for Trump and “difficult” for the incumbent going into the heart of the 2024 primary cycle, according to Republican pollster Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies.

“It is hard to imagine a more difficult set of numbers before a reelection,” McInturff told NBC News.

With 73% of registered voters say the U.S. is on the wrong track under Biden, the only silver lining for the sitting president and Horwitt is there remains time to turn the numbers back around.

Basically, three out of four registered voters think Biden has screwed us up. And he has.

But the momentum in all areas, as the pollsters noted, remains steadily rising for Trump:

  • Border: Trump raised lead from 16 points in September 2020 to 35 points in January 2024.
  • Economy: Trump raised his 7-point lead in October 2020 to 22 points today.
  • Crime and violence: Trump turned a 4-point deficit during the 2020 riots to a 21-point lead today, a swing of 25 points.
  • Competent and effective: Trump flipped a 9-point deficit in June 2020 to a 16-point lead today, another 25-point swing.
  • Mental and physical health to be president: Trump turned a 1-point deficit in October 2020 — when he was hospitalized with COVID-19 — into a 23-point lead today.

All of these numbers are from an NBC poll. NBC is a far-left mouthpiece for the Democrat party; if their polling shows Trump with this kind of lead, the numbers themselves are probably actually better than being reported.

But.

The Democrats, the media, the progressives, the Marxists and the Leftists (is there an echo in here?) will absolutely, positively, wholly, utterly, completely and totally cheat to win the 2024 election. There is no doubt, uncertainty, hesitation, ambiguity, misgivings or skepticism about it.

In a recent article from The Epoch Times (I encourage you to subscribe), author Kevin Stocklin looks back at how a “well-funded cabal” influenced stole the 2020 election and how that will undoubtably affect the 2024 election.

While former President Donald Trump appears to be cruising toward the GOP nomination with a polling lead over incumbent President Joe Biden in key swing states, Republicans will likely face a much steeper climb in the general election than they realize.

Fundamental changes in state election laws, coupled with an alliance of left-wing federal, corporate, financial, and nonprofit entities, have handed the Democratic Party advantages that the GOP may be unable to overcome.

[…]

In 2020, the landscape shifted in the wake of two events: The COVID-19 pandemic and the death of George Floyd in police custody. A narrative emerged that existing state voting laws had to change because they were racist and hazardous to public health.

The 2020 ‘Shadow Campaign’
In a laudatory 2021 article in Time titled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” author Molly Ball detailed a “well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage, and control the flow of information.”

While praising the effort, Ms. Ball said that the actors “were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”

The key to the whole mirage of a non-rigged election were the changes to “rules and laws” that affected how and when people could vote.

The “conspiracy,” as Ms. Ball described it, included DNC operatives, union leaders, tech and social-media companies, Wall Street bankers, and a network of nonprofit donor funds that pooled hundreds of millions of dollars to finance “armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time.”

While the coalition’s purpose, ostensibly, was “saving democracy,” the overriding goal was to keep President Trump from winning a second term.

And the “well-funded cabal” appears to be gearing up for a repeat performance in 2024, with a few new twists.

Interesting that the Left felt the need to “fortify” the election to keep Trump from winning a second term and that, lo and behold!, the results favored them.

The DNC and groups allied with them rely on a five-part strategy to ensure that President Trump didn’t then and will not now get a second term.

That strategy includes intense legal pressure on state election officials to loosen voter integrity laws, a data nerve center that contains personal profiles of voters to predict how they will vote, an alliance of left-wing foot soldiers to bring out Democratic votes in key swing states, a collection of groups capable of bringing violence and mass unrest to cities and towns if called upon, and a network of financing vehicles to fund it all.

It’s not impossible for Trump to win, but after the gross misconduct of the Left in the 2020 election, all bets are off.

Daily Broadside | The Fool at the Top of the Political Heap is At Odds with Islamists and That Concerns You

Let me get the most important story out of the way at the top of the post: Taylor Swift won a record fourth “best album of the year” last night at the Grammys, besting Frank Sinatra, Paul Simon and Stevie Wonder, who each have three.

Woo-hoo.

Now let’s get to the lighter stuff.

I read with interest the latest column by Robert Spencer. If you don’t read Robert Spencer, you should. Spencer is one of the foremost authorities in the U.S. (and possibly the world) when it comes to an outsider’s understanding of Islam, jihad, the Qur’an, and terrorism. He’s written a number of books and, because he views Islam contrary to the (woke) sensibilities of the dominant political climate in the Western world, he has been labeled an anti-Muslim activist, an Islamophobe, an inflammatory speaker, someone who promotes hate, intolerance, and bigotry, and he has been banned from entering the UK because of his work. This in spite of the fact that he was at one time a trainer for the FBI and the U.S. military, both of which now shun him even though he hasn’t changed his views.

In his column titled “Old Joe Biden Has a New Nickname, and This One Isn’t Funny At All,” Spencer writes that Van Jones is putting pressure on Brandon to abandon Israel to Hamas because young Muslims in America are threatening to withhold their votes for him come November.

Jones’ warning comes amid ongoing efforts to force Biden to betray Israel by threatening him at the ballot box. Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), who infamously said that he was “happy” about Hamas’ Oct. 7 jihad massacre of 1,200 Israelis, thundered at a November pro-Hamas rally: “No cease-fire, no votes. No votes in Michigan, no votes in Arizona, no votes in Georgia, no votes in Nevada, no votes in Wisconsin, no votes in Pennsylvania.” These were, of course, the states that allowed Old Joe to pretend to be president over the last three years. Awad concluded: “No votes for you anywhere if you don’t call for a ceasefire now.” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Ramallah) added: “The American people won’t forget. Biden, support a ceasefire now. Or don’t count on us in 2024.”

Now, according to a Saturday Fox News report, Old Joe is “facing an electoral revolt among Arab and Muslim voters in Michigan who are outraged by his ongoing support for Israel, with some even accusing him of enabling genocide.” They’ve even launched an “abandon Biden” campaign in Dearborn. On CNN, Erin Burnett told Jones about a former Biden campaign prole who told a CNN reporter “that he will not vote for Biden again even knowing that it may help Trump. He says Biden is ‘not somebody I can trust.’” Wow, stop the presses!

A couple of thoughts about this report that don’t directly address the issue of Brandon’s nickname. The first is that “Arab and Muslim voters” are threatening to vote as a block not as Americans, but as Arabs and Muslims. Hatred for Israel is not an American value; it’s an Arab and Muslim value.

This is the problem with unwise and unvetted immigration. I’m sure that many of these “Arab and Muslim” voters have American citizenship, but they aren’t acting in the interests of being American. They’re acting first, perhaps only, as Muslims.

And while you may say that they are free to practice their religion in America just like Christians are free to practice theirs, the difference is that “Christian” and “American” values, while imperfectly practiced, were nearly synonymous for most of our history. We assert the dignity of all human beings, oppose injustice, believe in punishing the offender, protecting women and children, and fighting for the inherent God-given freedoms that all men possess.

That’s not true for adherents of Islam, who believe that Allah, through the Qur’an, commands them to subjugate, oppress and to kill Jews and Christians. So, now that we are looking more like the European contintent that is losing its homogeneity, we have to deal with an increasing tribalism in America, an example of which is a united voting block that puts its Islamic political and religious culture first—a political and religious culture that cuts against what used to define American politics and culture.

The second thing that I want to point out is that Dearborn, Michigan, is home to the largest “Arab American” community in the U.S. “Arab and Muslim voters” are now the majority as the city becomes a Muslim enclave—similar to Hamtramck, MI, home of America’s first Muslim-majority city council—and the effects of the large Muslim presence is felt in places like schools, where all the meat served at lunch is now halal, i.e. sharia compliant, in being “the first U.S. city to offer Eid al-Fitr, one of Islam’s major holidays that marks the end of Ramadan, as a paid holiday for city employees,” and in its leader’s vocal support for Hamas.

That support led to a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece that called Dearborn “America’s Jihad Capital” and generated a backlash where any questioning of Islam and its political or religious tenets subjects you to accusations of bigotry, Islamophobia, racism and hate.

The WSJ Opinion article titled, “Welcome to Dearborn, America’s Jihad Capital” is written by Steven Stalinsky, Ph.D., an American commenter on Middle Eastern terrorism who has served as the executive director of the Middle East Media Research Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit dedicated to international media analysis, since 1999.

Stalinsky’s article goes on to compare Dearborn’s pro-Palestinian protests over Israel’s response in Gaza to Hamas’ attack on Israel to celebrations of the Oct. 7 massacre in the West Bank.

“Support for terrorism in southern Michigan has long been a concern for U.S. counterterrorism officials,” he writes. “What’s happening in Dearborn isn’t simply a political problem for Democrats. It’s potentially a national security issue affecting all Americans. Counterterrorism agencies at all levels should pay close attention.”

Islam is incompatible with American law, starting with the U.S. Constitution. We fool ourselves if we believe that Islam doesn’t pose a threat to the United States. We will eventually see enclaves that are “no-go zones”, i.e. locations that rule themselves according to sharia law without regard to American norms or constitutional law, and which shut out non-Muslims and any effort to enforce state laws. Those sites will eventually expand to include entire cities, and, given enough time, those will expand to include entire states.

Guaranteed.

Being called “Genocide Joe” is the very least of Brandon’s problems, but what it signifies should be one of the gravest concerns of all freedom-loving Americans.

Daily Broadside | If You’re Looking for a Way to Make a Difference in Politics, You Could Start By Voting

So many “Republicans” are disgusted by American politics that they’re staying home and ceding power to their enemies.

LAS VEGAS, Nevada — Turning Point Action, the political arm of conservative movement leader Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA, has identified more than 4.5 million so-called “disengaged” Republican voters in several battleground states around the country, enough to more than swing the 2024 presidential election’s results from 2020.

[…]

“It’s a turnout game,” Kirk, who leads Turning Point, told Breitbart News. “It’s the exact opposite of what people would have believed. I’m very, very focused and have been for quite some time and will continue to be on these numbers. I believe it’s all going to come down to three states. Trump is going to win Iowa. He’ll win Ohio. He’ll win North Carolina by a little bit—it’s not going to be a blowout. He’ll win Florida by a million votes, so I don’t think Trump should even actively campaign in Iowa, Ohio, and Florida. It’s got to be all in on Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. Georgia, I’m feeling better and better about. Republicans are really coming home. They’re outpacing Democrats 1.5 to one in voter registration. Arizona, I think we’re beginning to get our act together. We’re headquartered there. We have a great new state party chair who really knows what she’s doing. Wisconsin, I’m worried about. The problem is, when I talk to some of these people, they say, ‘Oh my goodness, maybe Pennsylvania.’ I’m not that bullish on Pennsylvania. It’s a big state. If Pennsylvania falls, that means Wisconsin also falls. Look, it’s a turnout election. I really believe that, and it comes down to: Can we really turn out another 50,000 to 60,000 more Republican voters?”

I agree that those states are going to be key.

Here’s the thing: it’s great to identify a huge group of non-voters who could turn the election, but that’s assuming that we’re still dealing with “””normal””” election processes, which we’re clearly not. So not only is it important to target that group of people to commit to vote, it’s crucial to get as many as possible out to vote because if it’s close, the Democrats, the media, the Left, the Marxists and the progressives (but I stutter) can’t cheat their way to victory the way they did in 2020.

But they will try. Oh, how they will try.

The numbers, which Turning Point Action provided to Breitbart News exclusively, are stunning. Across ten battleground states, the group identified 4,571,210 disengaged GOP voters who did not vote in 2016 or 2020. The ten states counted are Florida, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Ohio, Michigan, Arizona, North Carolina, and Nevada. While Trump won Florida, Iowa, Ohio, and North Carolina in 2020, Democrat President Joe Biden took the other six states—and in each one, the disengaged GOP voters total was more than the margin of Biden’s victory over Trump.

For instance, in Pennsylvania, the margin between Trump and Biden was 80,555. The number of disengaged GOP voters was, per Turning Point Action’s analysis, 589,350—more than seven times the margin. In Michigan, the margin was 154,188 votes by which Biden beat Trump. Turning Point Action found 490,630 disengaged GOP voters there, more than three times the margin.

It was even more profound in places like Wisconsin, Arizona, and Georgia. In Georgia, the margin was 11,779—and the number of disengaged GOP voters was, per Turning Point Action, 539,480—more than 45 times the margin. In Arizona, the margin between Trump and Biden was 10,457—and Turning Point Action identified 286,440 disengaged GOP voters there, more than 27 times the margin. In Wisconsin, 20,682 votes separated Trump and Biden—and Turning Point identified 542,720 disengaged GOP voters there. That is more than 26 times the margin.

In Nevada, where this conference is taking place, the margin between Biden and Trump in 2020 was 33,596 votes—and Turning Point Action has identified 140,540 disengaged GOP voters in the Silver State, more than four times the margin.

If you don’t want to live in a police state similar to China, you had best get out there and exercise your vote, even if you have to hold your nose while pulling the lever for Trump. As for me, if Trump is the nominee, I will crawl naked over broken glass scattered over hot asphalt to pull the lever for him.

Sitting home and pouting isn’t going to help.